PLEASE NOTE: Add your own commentary here above the horizontal line, but do not make any changes below the line. (Of course, you should also delete this text before you publish this post.)
This article titled “AA sounds safety warning over smart motorways” was written by Ben Quinn, for The Guardian on Monday 8th April 2019 10.42 UTCThe AA has expressed safety concerns about a plan to remove the hard shoulder from hundreds of miles of motorway over the next six years.
A network of so-called smart motorways will be without the traditional emergency lane, while emergency laybys will be closer together.
The speed limit past roadworks will also be increased from 50mph to 60mph as part of the introduction of “digital roads”.
The system, in which the hard shoulder will be taken away from 400 miles of motorway, will be safer because emergency laybys allowed vehicles to pull off the motorway, separating them from fast-moving traffic, according to Highways England.
Its chief executive, Jim O’Sullivan, told the Times: “With the volume, speed and size of modern cars, the refuge areas are safer than the hard shoulder. You will not get a car or truck drifting into the emergency refuge area whereas they can and do drift into the hard shoulder.
“We are now well into smart motorway operation and the statistics we have are reliable. They are telling us that the safety record on smart motorways is arguably better than what we see on conventional motorways.”
One in 10 deaths on motorways occur on the hard shoulder, according to Highways England, and usually happen when vehicles hit stationary ones from behind.
However, motoring groups have raised safety fears. “We support road improvements to remove pinch points and improve motorway capacity but not if it compromises road safety,” said Edmund King, the AA president, which has been campaigning for laybys or emergency refuge areas (ERAs) on smart motorways.
ERAs would be safer than a hard shoulder if motorists could get to them, said King, who warned it was potentially more dangerous to exit an emergency layby than a hard shoulder as it was difficult to get up to speed.
The lack of hard shoulder also meant it took emergency vehicles longer to get to incidents due to traffic filling all lanes. King said: “Renaming smart motorways as ‘digital roads’ doesn’t mean the system still won’t crash. We are happy to embrace technology but more physical emergency laybys would reassure drivers and make our roads safer.”
The AA expressed concerns about smart motorways last month after the death of a motorist on a section of the M1 without a hard shoulder.
Smart motorways are part of a plan by Highways England to reduce congestion. The routes feature technology designed to monitor traffic levels, change speed limits and close lanes to allow emergency vehicles through.
The first such motorway was launched on the M42 in 2006. Journey reliability improved by 22% and the number of personal injury accidents were reduced by more than half, according to Highways England.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
